best dating apps for open relationships: top picks and pros and cons

What makes an app open-friendly

Open relationships thrive on clarity, consent, and flexibility. The best platforms make it easy to signal boundaries, filter for relationship styles, and communicate expectations up front.

  • Clear labels: Options for ENM, polyamory, couple profiles, and primary/secondary dynamics.
  • Discovery controls: Filters by intentions, openness, and visibility to friends or social circles.
  • Consent-first design: Prompts for agreements, group chats, and photo privacy.
  • Safety: Block/report tools, photo verification, and location precision controls.
  • Community norms: Guidelines that discourage unicorn hunting and push respectful messaging.

Bottom line: If an app doesn’t let you state your relationship style clearly, it’s likely not a good fit.

Top apps to try in 2025

Feeld

Built for ENM, with couple profiles, group chats, and nuanced identity/relationship labels.

  • Pros: Rich tags for boundaries; low stigma; discreet modes; events/real-world scenes.
  • Cons: Smaller pools outside major cities; occasional app glitches.

OkCupid

Long-form prompts and inclusive labels make it easy to be explicit about ethics and agreements.

  • Pros: Excellent questionnaires; ENM filters; thoughtful matches over swipes.
  • Cons: Messaging gated by reciprocity; time investment to optimize profile.

#open

Community-centered app focused on matching people with compatible boundaries and desires.

  • Pros: Consent-forward culture; couple profiles; detailed desire/boundary cards.
  • Cons: Limited user base in smaller regions; fewer mainstream features.

Bumble

Mainstream with strong safety features; workable for ethical non-monogamy when profiles are explicit.

  • Pros: Women-message-first reduces spam; verification; good for travelers.
  • Cons: ENM support is indirect; may face mismatch with monogamy-first users.

Tinder

Huge reach and fast discovery; best when you leverage bio clarity and location control.

  • Pros: Massive user base; flexible distance settings; easy for spontaneous meets.
  • Cons: Minimal filters; more effort to screen for ENM alignment.

If proximity matters most, explore the best dating app for nearby options for quick, local discovery.

PolyFinda

Designed for polyamorous communities; events and groups help you meet aligned networks.

  • Pros: Community-first vibe; educational resources; lower judgment spaces.
  • Cons: Niche population; fewer features than mainstream giants.

Who each app suits best

  • New to ENM: OkCupid for clarity; Feeld for culture fit.
  • City socialites: Feeld and Tinder for density and IRL events.
  • Boundary nerds: #open for detailed consent cards.
  • Safety-first daters: Bumble for verification and control.
  • Community builders: PolyFinda for groups and meetups.

Career-focused and time-poor? You may appreciate curated matches like the best dating app for older professionals to cut through noise.

How to set up for success

Profile clarity

  • State your relationship structure, agreements, and what you’re open to (dating solo, together, parallel).
  • Include non-negotiables, safer sex practices, and scheduling realities.
  • Short, clear bio beats vague hints.

Filters and photos

  • Use ENM/poly filters where available; tag intentions (friends, dates, partners).
  • Show authentic lifestyle photos; avoid cropping out partners-use consented couple pics when relevant.

Messaging etiquette

  • Lead with boundaries and consent. Ask, don’t assume.
  • Be transparent if you’re dating solo vs. as a couple.
  • No pressure, no secrecy, no bait-and-switch.

Safety and privacy

  • Use apps with verification and robust reporting. Turn on incognito or phone-number privacy.
  • Meet in public first; share plans with a trusted friend.
  • Discuss STI testing cadence and safer sex practices before intimacy.

Pricing and value

Free tiers help you sample culture and density; paid tiers add filters, boosts, and visibility. Pay when a feature saves you time. Otherwise, optimize your profile first.

Quick comparison takeaways

  • Feeld/#open = best culture fit; OkCupid = best clarity tools; Bumble/Tinder = best reach and speed; PolyFinda = best community depth.
  • Trade-off: Depth and consent tools often mean smaller pools; bigger pools require more screening.

FAQ

  • Which app is best for couples seeking together?

    Feeld and #open support couple profiles and shared chats, making it easy to message as a unit and set joint boundaries. PolyFinda also works well if you want event-driven discovery.

  • How do I avoid mismatches with monogamy-first users?

    Use platforms with ENM filters (Feeld, OkCupid, #open). On mainstream apps, put “ethically non-monogamous” and key boundaries in your first bio line, and swipe selectively on profiles that acknowledge ENM.

  • Are paid upgrades worth it for open relationships?

    If a subscription unlocks ENM filters, advanced search, or better location control, it can save time. Otherwise, invest first in profile clarity and photos, then add boosts during peak hours to test ROI.

  • What’s the safest way to disclose my status?

    State your structure and agreements in your bio, keep identifying details private until trust builds, and verify matches in-app. Share STI testing cadence early and confirm consent for any couple introductions.

  • Which app has the largest pool for quick local meets?

    Tinder generally offers the fastest local density; Feeld can be excellent in big cities. If hyper-local convenience is your priority, compare options via the best dating app for nearby picks to optimize for distance and immediacy.

Final tip: Choose culture fit first, then layer on reach-clarity and consent are your best filters.

 
desr
4.9 stars -1177 reviews